Integrating waste management and renewable energy planning

Thailand, East Asia and Pacific

Driven by concerns of energy security high dependence on imported fuels and environmental pollution due to improper waste disposal, Thailand has placed increasing emphasis on waste-to-energy options through its 10-year Renewable and Alternative Energy Development Plan (AEDP 2012-21). The plan presents a target of a 25% contribution of renewable and alternative energy sources by 2021, of which 30% is to come from bioenergy and municipal solid waste, representing an important step in the transition to a low-carbon economy.

The focus on waste and agricultural residues in the AEDP is a good example of policy coordination and alignment with decentralised implementation. The AEDP objectives are aligned with those of the National Economic and Social Development Plan (NESDP) as well as laws for municipal level governance. As part of the strategy, pilot implementation targets city level actions aimed at scaling up capacity building and replication with increased efficiency in other cities within and outside of Thailand. The strategy is highly integrated at various levels of governance in terms of its strategic goals and its mode of implementation. Its linkages with national goals of energy security, climate change and export promotion are notable and demonstrate clear political direction and leadership.

Impact of activities
  • Increasing targets: the approach to waste management and its integration into the AEDP has had positive results. Success to date can be measured by the regular upgrading of the target of energy from MSW. From 120 MW electricity target set in 2008, it was revised to 160 MW in 2012 and to 400MW electricity plus 200MW heat in 2013 (Budnard, 2014).
  • Pilot Projects: Overall, relevant ministries and municipalities are responsible for implementing the various GHG mitigation activities as part of Thailand’s low carbon strategy. For example, low carbon city pilot projects were recently undertaken in three cities and one special municipality including: Khonkaen (Khonkaen province); Klaeng (Rayong province); Samui (Surat Thani province) and Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (PMR 2014).
  • Model Facility: The waste to energy facility at Klaeng is considered a model solution compared to other municipalities and hence sets a national benchmark. The facility was an initiative of the Mayor of Klaeng, and it operates in a self-sufficient way, generating enough income to cover operational costs.
Institutions involved
  • Pollution control department
  • Ministry of Energy
  • Ministry of Interior
  • Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment
  • Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (TGO)
Source details
Global Good Practice Analysis (GIZ UNDP)