Discussion Paper: NDC Features, Transparency and Ambition
This discussion paper addresses some of the key questions discussed at the 2016 Annual Partnership Retreat, namely: What are nationally determined contribution (NDC) features? What is the difference between these features and the (accompanying) information for clarity, transparency and understanding (CTU)? What are the implications of such features and CTU information for accounting? How do features and accompanying information relate to the transparency modalities, procedures and guidelines and to the ambition mechanism associated with the global stocktake (GST)?
The paper first underlines the mandates from Paris and the conclusions from Marrakech and then focuses on features and CTU. Read more about the discussion paper here.
- UNDP, UNFCCC (2014): Asia-Pacific and Eastern Europe Technical Dialogue on Intended Nationally Determined Contributions to the 2015 Agreement under the UNFCCC
- GIZ (2016): Using a Systematic Communication Model to Optimise “Nationally Determined Contributions” Stakeholder Dialogues
- GIZ (2014): Capacity Building for Enhanced Reporting and Facilitation of International Mutual Learning through Peer-to-Peer Exchange
- Adelphi (2016): A look back to take the next steps forward. Five years of International Partnership on Mitigation and MRV (IPMM)
- IDDRI (2015) Working Paper: Transparency and the Paris Agreement - Driving Ambitious Action in the New Climate Regime
- Management and Destruction of Ozone Depleting Substances in ODS Banks
- Development of a NAMA for providing efficient cooling and air conditioning in industry and business
- Resource efficiency and secondary raw materials management as a contribution to climate change mitigation
- Finance Mechanisms for a Low-Carbon Development in Peru
- Accounting Rules for the Achievement of the Mitigation Goals of Non-Annex I Countries